[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#63984: [PATCH emacs-team 0/2] Start preparing for Emacs 29
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
bug#63984: [PATCH emacs-team 0/2] Start preparing for Emacs 29 |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:20:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.4 |
Am Mittwoch, dem 12.07.2023 um 18:15 +0000 schrieb Mekeor Melire:
> 2023-07-08 19:04 liliana.prikler@gmail.com:
>
> > Am Dienstag, dem 04.07.2023 um 07:39 +0000 schrieb Mekeor
> > Melire:
>
> > > Why don't we build emacs-minimal with the configure-flag
> > > --with-native-compilation=aot? If I understand correctly, this
> > > would compile all .el-files of emacs-packages to .eln-files by
> > > default. If I understand correctly, this currently only
> > > happens for emacs-packages that use (arguments (#:emacs
> > > emacs)).
>
> > There's no point in using emacs-minimal for native-comp. It
> > would just blow up our package sizes for no gain (any other
> > emacs won't read the natively compiled elisp stuff due to having
> > a different hash). If you have a use case for natively compiled
> > emacs-minimal (e.g. for editing stuff on a server that should
> > only carry small packages), I think there are better options
> > (possibly emacs-no-x or using a "transformed" package).
>
> Sorry. I think my suggestion was wrong and also I should submit it as
> a separate discussion. I'll send it to guix-devel. Stay tuned.
Possibly unrelated, but since we have 29.0.92 on master by now I pushed
this series and followed up with a merge.
Cheers