[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#66585] [PATCH] doc: Expound on the build-side versus host-side modu
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
[bug#66585] [PATCH] doc: Expound on the build-side versus host-side modules topic. |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2023 03:37:22 -0400 |
Discussed in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65924#98-lineno27>.
* doc/contributing.texi (Modules): Add new context indices, and provide a
real-life counter-example, and its ramifications.
Reported-by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Change-Id: I06975fb24f0d67c833884313a727dc550f61d8a0
---
doc/contributing.texi | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
index 864190b119..be159e237e 100644
--- a/doc/contributing.texi
+++ b/doc/contributing.texi
@@ -1279,14 +1279,19 @@ Programming Paradigm
@node Modules
@subsection Modules
-
+@cindex build-side modules
+@cindex host-side modules
Guile modules that are meant to be used on the builder side must live in
the @code{(guix build @dots{})} name space. They must not refer to
other Guix or GNU modules. However, it is OK for a ``host-side'' module
-to use a build-side module.
+to use a build-side module. As an example, the @code{(guix
+search-paths)} module should not be imported and used by a package since
+it isn't meant to be used as a ``build-side'' module. It would also
+couple the module with the package's dependency graph, which is
+undesirable.
Modules that deal with the broader GNU system should be in the
-@code{(gnu @dots{})} name space rather than @code{(guix @dots{})}.
+@code{(gnu @dots{})} name space rather than @code{(guix @dots{})}
@node Data Types and Pattern Matching
@subsection Data Types and Pattern Matching
base-commit: ff11cbc2e9589bcb98eb9cad1704b4b991d6f20e
--
2.41.0
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [bug#66585] [PATCH] doc: Expound on the build-side versus host-side modules topic.,
Maxim Cournoyer <=