[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#66143] [PATCH]: Update emacs-slime and sbcl-slime-swank to 2.28-0.1
|
From: |
Christopher Baines |
|
Subject: |
[bug#66143] [PATCH]: Update emacs-slime and sbcl-slime-swank to 2.28-0.1e4b741 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:08:28 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.5; emacs 28.2 |
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> writes:
> Patches applied as d62a613bcff726dfc835313064228e7bc3b7cda6 and
> following, with a completed commit message for the second patch.
I did raise an objection earlier in the thread to these changes being
merged. Not discussing (or even acknowledging issues raised) is
unhelpful.
Given what I've now read from upstream [1], I think it can be justified
in this case, but this is independent from the above. I think we still
should record reasons for deviating from the norm in comments (and
commit messages if useful).
1: https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/792
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature