[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#67598] [PATCH] gnu: services: guix: Allow gexps evaluating to a lis
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#67598] [PATCH] gnu: services: guix: Allow gexps evaluating to a list of build-machines |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:18:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi,
Saku Laesvuori <saku@laesvuori.fi> skribis:
> * gnu/services/base.scm (guix-machines-files-installation): Handle
> machines being a mixed list of build-machines and lists of
> build-machines.
> * doc/guix.texi: Document it.
>
> Change-Id: Ie404562ca0b564413233c3a624046da831893dc3
Sounds useful!
> (guix-configuration
> (build-machines
> (list #~(build-machine (name "foo.example.org") @dots{})
> - #~(build-machine (name "bar.example.org") @dots{}))))
> + #~(list (build-machine (name "bar.example.org") @dots{})
> + (build-machine (name "foobaz.example.org") @dots{})))))
I wouldn’t show both in the same example as it can be confusing. So
either leave the example unchanged or add a second one (maybe with
‘guix-extension’?).
> + (symlink #+(scheme-file "machines.scm"
> + `(apply append
Use ‘concatenate’ instead, and #~ instead of `.
> + (map (lambda (entry)
> + (if (list? entry)
> + entry
> + (list entry)))
> + ,machines)))
Since ‘list?’ is linear in the number of elements in the list, my
preference would be to write it like this:
(if (build-machine? entry)
(list entry)
entry)
Could you send an updated patch?
Thanks,
Ludo’.