[bug#67260] [PATCH v6 1/7] gnu: emacs: Wrap EMACSNATIVELOADPATH.

[Liliana Marie Prikler]

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, dem 25.01.2024 um 23:53 +0000 schrieb Suhail:
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > > Suhail via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> writes:
> > > 
> > > > I don't believe this patch is sufficient.  It seems that the
> > > > variable 'native-comp-eln-load-path may also need to be
> > > > tweaked.
> > > > The path to the "native-lisp" directory needs to be specified
> > > > absolutely to make it not be dependent on the invocation-
> > > > directory.
> > > 
> > ... I've managed to resolve it
> 
> I can confirm that Emacs built by installing v6 patches on emacs-team
> branch and built with --no-grafts is now able to locate
> natively-compiled versions of features like help-fns etc. (which it
> couldn't with v5 patches).
> 
> #+begin_src bash :results replace
>   emacs --batch --eval "(message \"%s\" (car (split-string (describe-
> function 'describe-function) \"\n\")))"
> #+end_src
> 
> #+RESULTS:
> : Type q in help window to delete it
> : describe-function is an autoloaded interactive native-compiled Lisp
> 
> 
> However, there may be a spurious entry in native-comp-eln-load-path
> that should probably be removed.
> 
> #+begin_src bash :results replace
>   emacs --batch --eval "(message \"%s\" native-comp-eln-load-path)"
> #+end_src
> 
> #+RESULTS:
> : (/home/user/.emacs.d/eln-cache/ /home/user/.guix-
> profile/lib/emacs/native-site-lisp
> /gnu/store/4jvap9wxifizm56p6pmxc6rk0zyvm5zc-emacs-
> 29.2/lib/emacs/29.2/native-lisp ../native-lisp/)
> 
> 
> The "../native-lisp/" entry above, seems out of place.  Based on the
> documentation of native-comp-eln-load-path:
> 
> > If the name of a directory in this list is not absolute, it is
> > assumed to be relative to invocation-directory.
> 
> Contrasting the above with an Emacs 29.1 installation on a non-Guix
> system, I notice that the latter doesn't have any non-absolute paths
> in native-comp-eln-load-path.  Thoughts?
I have noticed this myself, but I don't think that it's related to this
series.  Can you try 29.2 without the patches?  It might be related to
that bump.

Cheers