[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#68677] [PATCH 0/6] Service for "virtual build machines"
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#68677] [PATCH 0/6] Service for "virtual build machines" |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:25:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
> Yes, controlling CPU model and Linux kernel are worth:
>
> + CPU model because we already have examples of failures (Python 3.7
> packaged in Guix v1.0.0, some BLAS libraries, etc.);
Yes! And I think we should maintain a catalog of these problems (build
processes influenced by date, hardware, or kernel version).
Our horizon should be to somehow ensure such packages are always built
in the right environment, automatically, whether or not it involves
using a VM.
Ludo’.
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 0/6] Service for "virtual build machines", Ludovic Courtès, 2024/01/23
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 1/6] services: secret-service: Make the endpoint configurable., Ludovic Courtès, 2024/01/23
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 2/6] vm: Add ‘date’ field to <virtual-machine>., Ludovic Courtès, 2024/01/23
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 4/6] vm: Add ‘cpu-count’ field to <virtual-machine>., Ludovic Courtès, 2024/01/23
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 3/6] vm: Export <virtual-machine> accessors., Ludovic Courtès, 2024/01/23
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 5/6] marionette: Add #:peek? to ‘wait-for-tcp-port?’., Ludovic Courtès, 2024/01/23
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 6/6] services: Add ‘virtual-build-machine’ service., Ludovic Courtès, 2024/01/23
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 0/6] Service for "virtual build machines", Simon Tournier, 2024/01/25
- [bug#68677] [PATCH 0/6] Service for "virtual build machines",
Ludovic Courtès <=