guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#70584] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-llm.


From: Roman Scherer
Subject: [bug#70584] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-llm.
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:35:09 +0200

Hi Liliana,
I'm not sure if I understand your message. Do you say Guix does not want to package this?
This is a package you can use with Ollama and is packaged on GNU ELPA as well.
Greetings, Roman.

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024, 19:00 Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 26.04.2024 um 09:04 +0200 schrieb Roman Scherer:
> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-llm): New variable.
>
> Change-Id: Ie89eac7a4f0a31245b6d826ae9885a7092528ced
> ---
>  gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> index 8a2ffc621d..8c712612b6 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> @@ -1606,6 +1606,31 @@ (define-public emacs-libgit
>  libgit2 bindings for Emacs, intended to boost the performance of
> Magit.")
>        (license license:gpl2+))))
>  
> +(define-public emacs-llm
> +  (package
> +    (name "emacs-llm")
> +    (version "0.13.0")
> +    (source (origin
> +              (method git-fetch)
> +              (uri (git-reference
> +                    (url "https://github.com/ahyatt/llm")
> +                    (commit version)))
> +              (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> +              (sha256 (base32
> +                      
> "1q7djz4zx1br4d3g46f1m5cbxwl050qjmsm2cy7zcww64rrkcj0l"))))
> +    (build-system emacs-build-system)
> +    (home-page "https://github.com/ahyatt/llm")
> +    (synopsis " Emacs library abstracting Large Language Model
> capabilities.")
> +    (description
> +     "This is a library for interfacing with Large Language Models. 
> It allows
> +elisp code to use LLMs, but allows gives the end-user an option to
> choose
> +which LLM they would prefer.  This is especially useful for LLMs,
> since there
> +are various high-quality ones that in which API access costs money,
> as well as
> +locally installed ones that are free, but of medium quality. 
> Applications
> +using LLMs can use this library to make sure their application works
> +regardless of whether the user has a local LLM or is paying for API
> access.")
> +    (license license:gpl3+)))
> +
No advertising nonfree software, thanks.

Also, I'd like you to know that training such "high quality" LLMs comes
at a larger cost than is given back in use in societal or environmental
terms.

Cheers

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]