guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#72835] [PATCH qt-team 32/38] gnu: Add qtconnectivity.


From: Maxim Cournoyer
Subject: [bug#72835] [PATCH qt-team 32/38] gnu: Add qtconnectivity.
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 00:28:22 +0900
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Hi Zheng,

Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn> writes:

> * gnu/packages/qt.scm (qtconnectivity): New variable.
>
> Change-Id: Ia2c1d9d260b47cd3a18c9ab5ac7e8f5ea83b7e11
> ---
>  gnu/packages/qt.scm | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/qt.scm b/gnu/packages/qt.scm
> index 1956fec57a..df8759b832 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/qt.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/qt.scm
> @@ -1688,6 +1688,29 @@ (define-public qtconnectivity-5
>      (description "The Qt Connectivity modules provides modules for 
> interacting
>  with Bluetooth and NFC.")))
>  
> +(define-public qtconnectivity
> +  (package
> +    (inherit qtsvg)
> +    (name "qtconnectivity")
> +    (version "6.6.3")
> +    (source (origin
> +              (method url-fetch)
> +              (uri (qt-url name version))
> +              (sha256
> +               (base32
> +                "066mf4d6a81ywviwr8bvm1mpm2ykjzysvcc0v2x82h5bl28vl6h9"))))
> +    (native-inputs
> +     (list perl pkg-config qtdeclarative))
> +    (inputs
> +     (list bluez qtbase))
> +    (arguments (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments qtsvg)
> +                 ((#:phases phases)
> +                  #~(modify-phases #$phases
> +                      (delete 'delete-installed-tests)))))
> +    (synopsis "Qt Connectivity module")
> +    (description "The Qt Connectivity modules provides modules for 
> interacting
> +with Bluetooth and NFC.")))

I'm not sure about using inheritance this way; the packages are
unrelated. You'd at least want to ensure propagated-inputs is forced to
'() in case qtsvg had some added in the future.

I think I had refrained from using this style for Qt 6 thus far, as I
found it obfuscated the package definitions for Qt 5.

Could you rewrite it to use the style as used for example by
qtshadertools?  Only the home page and license fields need to be
specified.  So it's one field difference, and better clarity.

Could you please send a v2?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]