[bug#72766] [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: slurm: Move client executables into separate output.

[Arun Isaac]

Hi Ludo,

> I think “bin” would be a more conventional name for the output; this is
> used in a couple of packages and recognized by ‘package->recutils’.

Sure, fixed now.

> However, what does ‘guix size slurm:client’ report?  I suspect it
> depends on slurm:out, in which case moving to a separate output makes no
> difference from that perspective.

Yep, that's right.

$ ./pre-inst-env guix size slurm:out | tail -n1
total: 192.6 MiB
$ ./pre-inst-env guix size slurm:bin | tail -n1
total: 201.3 MiB
$ ./pre-inst-env guix size slurm:bin | grep slurm
/gnu/store/2qhgkq79ahw64n4kmr3znl8v66z0n87j-slurm-23.11.10         192.6    
17.5   8.7%
/gnu/store/6f3d93i0zdr48v6bp471dfsk7r89xdqh-slurm-23.11.10-bin     201.3     
1.3   0.6%

Should I then go back to the idea of creating a slurm-minimal variant?

Regards,
Arun