Re: [Gzz-commits] gzz/doc/pegboard/coding_standard--vegai peg.rst

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 02:06:21PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote:
> >    - java imports
> >    - gzz imports
> 
> I'd prefer first gzz, then java, for consistency with Java files and 
> because this makes those imports rest in alphabetical order. (Hmm, come 
> to think of it, I would like to have that rule included: In each group, 
> imports should be in alphabetical order.)

I disagree: more importantly it should be "foreign stuff" "our stuff".

> >+7. Prefer list comprehensions to iterations, especially when dealing with 
> >lists.
> 
> This isn't really clear to me. :-) List comprehensions should be used 
> iff they make the code easier to read and understand. The following is 
> very much not good:
> 
>     [java.lang.System.out.println(el) for el in list]
> 
> though it will correctly print out each element in 'list.'

Indeed.

> >+8. Class names are CapitalizedWords.
> >+
> >+9. Class methods and attributes are mixedCase.
> >+
> >+10. Functions are lower_case_with_underscores, variables are lowercase.
> 
> I don't like this-- I think that for consistency, these should be 
> mixedCase too. They are closest in function to Java's static attributes 
> and methods, which are also mixedCase.

Agreed.

        Tuomas