Re: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst

[Benja Fallenstein]

Toni Alatalo wrote:
> Log message:
>         clarification(?) with respect to peernet: storm can be on top of ip or 
> something else, e.g. peernet

Two points:

1. Storm isn't even necessarily on top of any network. Saying that it 
can be on top of IP or peernet is confusing since it seems to imply that 
Storm necessarily needs a network.

2. Storm is also way too far up the stack for the network layer to make 
any difference-- it's like saying that HTTP can work over WLAN as well 
as wired ethernet. :-) I think saying this doesn't add anything...

-b.