Re: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article_structure.txt

[Alatalo Toni]

On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Benja Fallenstein wrote:

> I can see how it would be nice if the section names could tell the
> uninitiated reader what the section will be about, but I don't think
> 'data model' and 'hypermedia model' cut that. :-) Plus, 'Xanalogical
> storage' should be a word known to many in the field, making it more
> precise than just 'hypermedia model.'

i meant that both the general and the particular would be there.
nice to hear that you see how it could be nice too :)
i don't think that the ones i came up were good, either.

> > 5. indexing: ok?
> This is what I'm least comfortable with, since it doesn't seem to be
> descriptive enough a name...

hm. and i couldn't come up with anything that would describe what it is
about

> > 7. peer-to-peer implementations: ?
> What's the problem here?

perhaps none. i guess we don't want to discuss non-peertopeer impls at
all, and if we do, they can be dealt with there -- explaining why we don't
want to :)

but originally i left a questionmark there again for the reason that i
couldn't come up with a good generalization. thought of something about
networking / storage / distribution / publication etc.

> -b.

~Toni

P.S. i was watching irc only (as it shows the commits) but not this box
for a while, so noticed your posts only now when i had ~10minutes left
before have to leave. but generally i don't think we have major problems
with the issues i wrote about and you commented on, and hope that didn't
confuse you with all that either.. most important to be constructive with
the actual text (and hopefully soon, finally, the diagrams!) - right?