[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/FutureVision vision.rst

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Branch:         
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/09/18 13:59:31

Modified files:
        FutureVision   : vision.rst 

Log message:
        OHM back, refs

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst.diff?tr1=1.127&tr2=1.128&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst
diff -u manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.127 
manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.128
--- manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.127   Thu Sep 18 13:59:00 2003
+++ manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst Thu Sep 18 13:59:31 2003
@@ -654,28 +654,40 @@
 information into the vocabularies expected by either view.
 
 
-..  5.4 Open Hypermedia
-    -------------------
+5.5 Open Hypermedia
+-------------------
 
-    XXX Should we just not mention open hypermedia?
+The open hypermedia (OHM) approach to adding structure
+to the user's operating environment is wildly 
+different from ours.
+Instead of focusing on unifying the internal data
+model and views and avoiding different "applications",
+OHM focuses on hyperlink interoperability between existing
+applications (`Pearl 1989`).
 
-       - Focus: interoperability, existing apps.
+However, the OHM field 
 
-       - Nelson (XXX) says "An application is a prison" -- 
-         an Open Hypermedia -enabled
-         application is a prison where you can get visitors and
-         send and receive mail - MUCH MUCH better but still...
-         REF: Task-oriented MIT project tuukkah discussed
+FOHM (Millard et al 2000)
 
-       - This is not meant to underestimate the work - OHM people have
-         done a lot of interesting, difficult work
-         in connecting monolithic, closed applications.
+XXX Should we just not mention open hypermedia?
 
-    FOHM: step towards hyperstructure: different domains
-    unified into a single conceptual structure.
+    - Focus: interoperability, existing apps.
 
+    - Nelson (XXX) says "An application is a prison" -- 
+      an Open Hypermedia -enabled
+      application is a prison where you can get visitors and
+      send and receive mail - MUCH MUCH better but still...
+      REF: Task-oriented MIT project tuukkah discussed
 
-5.4 Fluid Links and Transpointing Windows
+    - This is not meant to underestimate the work - OHM people have
+      done a lot of interesting, difficult work
+      in connecting monolithic, closed applications.
+
+FOHM: step towards hyperstructure: different domains
+unified into a single conceptual structure.
+
+
+5.5 Fluid Links and Transpointing Windows
 -----------------------------------------
 
 Buoys share some of their aims
@@ -835,7 +847,14 @@
 
 **Marshall, C.C.,** (1998)
 "Towards an ecology of hypertext annotation".
-ACM Hypertext`98 proceedings, 40-49.
+ACM Hypertext'98 proceedings, 40-49.
+
+.. _`Millard et al (2000)`:
+
+**Millard, D.E., Moreau, L., Davis, H.C. and Reich, S.,** (200)
+"FOHM: a fundamental open hypertext model for investigating interoperability 
between hypertext domains".
+ACM Hypertext'00 proceedings, 93-102.
+
 
 .. _`Nelson (1965)`:
 
@@ -903,6 +922,12 @@
 **Parunak, H.V.D.,** (1991)
 "Don't Link Me In: Set Based Hypermedia for Taxonomic Reasoning".
 ACM Hypertext '91 proceedings, 233-242.
+
+.. _`Pearl 1989`:
+
+**Pearl, A.,** (1989)
+"Sun's Link Service: a protocol for open linking".
+ACM Hypertext '89 proceedings, 137-146.
 
 .. _`Thüring et al (1995)`: