[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz] Raw pools?
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
[Gzz] Raw pools? |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:47:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
An idea, related to the "canonical blocks":
Maybe we should label some pools "raw", i.e. no header, just a block of
binary data. That way, we could be compatible with other content-based systems
for externally obtained data.
Tuomas
- [Gzz] Raw pools?,
Tuomas Lukka <=
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/10
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/10
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/10
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/11
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/11
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/16
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/16
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/16
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/17
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/18