[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] Raw pools? |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:05:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:56:45PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
>
> Argl. Hope this time the indentation isn't eaten again.
>
> - Storm core
> . - Concept and rationale: Blocks to move easily between pools
> . - The persistency commitment
> . - API
> . - Block format (header with content-type, opaque body), id format
> . - Backward compatibility: Old specs we need to continue to support
> - Applications
> . - Pointers [could possibly be a single PEG]
> . . - Concept: rich branching versioning without central repository
> . . - Pointer block format
> . . - API
> . . - Challenges when used on the network
> . . (digital signatures; what to do if not all pointer blocks are known)
> . - Diffs
> . - Xanalogical media
> . . - Concept: Content stored in blocks, other blocks refer to it
> . . (and there's a reverse indexing mechanism for referals)
> . . - Formats
> . . - API
Sounds good. We could start with the ones I mentioned in the other email.
Tuomas
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, (continued)
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/10
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/11
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/11
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/16
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/16
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/16
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/17
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/18
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/18
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/16
- Re: [Gzz] Raw pools?,
Tuomas Lukka <=