|
From: | Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: | Re: [Gzz] ``bug_test_rst--benja``: Marking failing tests to use ReST |
Date: | Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:30:50 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1 |
Tuomas Lukka wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:============================================================= ``bug_test_rst--benja``: Marking failing tests to use ReST ============================================================= :Author: Benja Fallenstein :Last-Modified: $Date: 2002/11/22 10:49:04 $ :Revision: $Revision: 1.1 $ :Status: Current Tuomas' "`Handling Bugs`_" PEG specifies that an RFC 2822-like syntax should be used to mark failing PEGs. However,Hmm... probably it would make sense to refer to PEGs by their unique id, as a principle?
Hmm... I don't like to have to use computerish ids instead of proper titles. OTOH, seeing the PEG id quickly helps in plain-text reading... I don't know, maybe
. "Handling Bugs" [bug_test--tjl] specifies...and make it so that ReST links [bug_test--tjl] to the appropriate PEG. Or alternately,
. [bug_test--tjl: Handling Bugs] specifies... Not sure. - Benja
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |