CC important messages (was: Re: [Gzz] xupdf direction: please read)

[Benja Fallenstein]

Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> > As you can see, both have large pros and cons. So I'd like to ask for
> > your opinions. The hardest is that I'm not at all sure which one
> > will need greater effort and which one will be more useful.
>
>
> Well, this seems to have been delayed at nongnu. I have now
> decided to pursue alternative #1.

It seems like time-critical messages should be cc:ed to address@hidden, at 
least when we know that delays are going on. Not an ideal solution, 
because it only helps people on that list, but better than this...

-b.