Re: [Gzz] umltool STILL broken!

[Asko Soukka]

Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Tuomas Lukka kirjoitti:
> Vegai, the fix still doesn't work: e.g. 
> gzz/doc/pegboard/buoydesign--tjl/peg.rst
> gets miscompiled: the first two diagrams are OK, but the last ones
> get totally wrong references:
>
> Compare the following
> <a id="BuoyviewModel"></a>
> <img src="../../uml/BuoyviewModel_doc_pegboard_buoydesign--tjl_peg.gen.png" 
> usemap="#BuoyviewModel" alt="BuoyviewModel" />
...
> <a id="BuoyManagerBasic"></a>
> <img 
> src="../../../../../../../../uml/BuoyManagerBasic_doc_pegboard_buoydesign--tjl_peg.gen.png"
>  usemap="#BuoyManagerBasic" alt="BuoyManagerBasic" />

Vegai: Do you remember where I created a stored temporarily settings in
       umlrst.py. This means that it doesn't somehow work now, but those
       reference paths are created cumulatively and wrong :(

       Would it be good that you restore the old working CVS version, add
       your settings class there, but don't use it yet? Just tell me how
       it should be used (I should be able to retrieve the same settings
       space from every modul, should it be also only module, not an
       instantioned class?

       Could you please also check mputils.transition_path()
       e.g. from foo1/foo3/ and foo2/ it should return ../../foo2, and

       from foo1/foo2/foo3/foo.html and foo1/foo4/foo.html,
       ../../foo4/foo.html

       Probably you know better way to implement that than me, because
       this is probably a _very old_ problem.

I have no idea how umltool, could be currently tested using our
unit test. Singel rst-loop run is currently the best. At least the test
should be very code spesific since umltool will still change a lot.

Probably I still have to add a couple of more kludges to get screenshots
in time for the article, but then it's going to be restructured.

-- 
Asko Soukka <address@hidden>   (btw, my homepages are now
<http://www.iki.fi/asko.soukka/>    created using docutils ;)