Re: [Gzz] Splitting PEG

[Benja Fallenstein]

Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> - What should be the basis for licenses?
>
>     SUGGESTED RESOLUTION: Originality. If a package
>     is just an implementation of something already well-known
>     and already implemented somewhere, LGPL would be preferred.
>     For original work, GPL is preferred because it gives more 
>     incentive for others to make free software.

In the spirit of [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html]. Ok.

> -----
> Storm
> -----
>
> :Maintainer: Benja Fallenstein
> :License: GPL ?

Yep, GPL.

> --------
> Xu-Storm
> --------
>
> :Maintainer: Tuomas J. Lukka or Benja Fallenstein
> :License: GPL ?

Yep, GPL.

> ------
> LibVob
> ------
>
> :Maintainer: Tuomas J. Lukka
> :License: GPL ?

Yep, GPL.

> A graphical library providing automatic animation between unrelated
> views, if the views are reasonably defined.

(And connections cross-cutting the hierarchy.)

> Todo:
> """""
>
> - Take out all Gzz-related renderables
>
> - Make the renderable structure better and easily extensible by
>   external code
>
> - document well

- tools for linebreaking formatted text

> -----------------------------------------------------
> TheCoreProjectThatHasNoNameYetButIsTheRealOverallGoal
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> :Maintainer: Tuomas J. Lukka
> :License: GPL ?

Yep, GPL :-)

- Benja