[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] RDF?
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] RDF? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:12:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:40:45PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Tuomas: What's your current thinking about RDF-- can it provide the
> lowest level for the structure you're aiming at? If so, would it make
> sense for me to write a PEG proposing to use it (could we accept that
> now)? I'd like to start thinking about the API to use so that
> implementation can start soon.
I have to say I'm not 100% sure yet either way.
While RDF looks very promising and is standard and has a reasonable
data model, there's a really big downfall:
versioning.
The RDF sequences are specified by the properties rdf:_1, rdf:_2, ...
which means that an insertion to a sequence will have use remove and add
a LOT of tuples.
If we can handle this, should be ok.
Tuomas
- [Gzz] RDF?, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/02/20
- Re: [Gzz] RDF?,
Tuomas Lukka <=