[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website
From: |
Antonio Gallo |
Subject: |
Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:04:43 +0100 (BST) |
Hi, perhaps I've lost some emails about this issue.. anyway, I think this issue
is linked to the problem of listing sellers... What should we specify if a
laptop is sold with a free OS by a seller and with a non free OS by a different
seller?
Perhaps we could use these options?
- not-specified
- no
- yes, usually shipped with non free OS installed
- yes, usually shipped with free OS installed
In the case it is usually shipped with non free OS (that can be replaced) we
could add the suggested text:
=============================================================================
This device ships with proprietary software pre-installed. It can be upgraded
to free software, which is why it is listed on h-node.org.
=============================================================================
What do you think?
Antonio
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Michał Masłowski <address@hidden>
A: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Inviato: Sabato 8 Giugno 2013 20:10
Oggetto: Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website
> "Can the pre-installed proprietary OS be replaced with a free one?"
> - Yes
> - No
> - Comes with a free OS
I think the only problem with the existing question is that some devices
might come with a free OS (none do yet), maybe in some variants only
(e.g. YeeLoongs from Freedom Included had gNewSense preinstalled). Your
question technically allows considering a system that cannot be replaced
free, I believe we shouldn't list this option.
Maybe add a "yes, is preinstalled" option to the existing field? We
need to clarify when it should be used if there are variants or options
with nonfree systems.
>> There is no router category yet. Would it be useful when such devices
>> need specific support from the distro running on them?
>
> With the addition of LibreWRT [1] to the FSF approved distro list,
> should we add the router category as if it works or not with LibreWRT?
> What other fields should be on that category?
The distro needs specific support for each device, their list should be
authoritative (it lists two devices [0]). Ask their developers if
h-node would be useful for them and what fields should be added?
There are many existing discussions of non-laptop computers, we might
add them as laptop subtypes; it isn't an appropriate solution for
routers.
(Normal computers running Trisquel are also useful as routers.)
[0] http://librewrt.org/index.php?title=Hardware_Support