[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h5md-user] Volume
From: |
Konrad Hinsen |
Subject: |
Re: [h5md-user] Volume |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:04:21 +0100 |
Pierre de Buyl writes:
> The problem is that, when we are pushing the boundaries of science [1], we
> find
> ourselves in situations where we cannot convert everything (semi-open
> systems,
> subsystems, etc.).
>
> I am in favor of not having 'volume' mandatory. And neither 'density'.
+1
I have situations (simulations of proteins in gas phase) where my
system has an energy and a temperature, but neither volume nor density
(nor pressure). Whether or not one can use thermodynamics on such
systems is hotly debated (the keyword to look for is "thermodynamics
of small systems"). But I don't think a file format should impose a
particular point of view in this debate.
Konrad.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen
Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS Orléans
Synchrotron Soleil - Division Expériences
Saint Aubin - BP 48
91192 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
Tel. +33-1 69 35 97 15
E-Mail: research AT khinsen DOT fastmail DOT net
http://dirac.cnrs-orleans.fr/~hinsen/
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0330-9428
Twitter: @khinsen
---------------------------------------------------------------------