health-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Health-dev] Fw: Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated fo


From: address@hidden
Subject: [Health-dev] Fw: Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 19:08:40 +0100 (BST)


>----Original Message----
>From: address@hidden
>Date: 09/09/2014 14:38 
>To: 
"address@hidden"<address@hidden>
>Subj: Re: 
[Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU 
Health?
>
>Hi Andrew and Luis,
>
>Am 09.09.2014 um 13:07 schrieb 
address@hidden:
>> Hi Luis
>>
>> When setting up a new "Party" = 
supplier (pharmaceutical wholesaler)
>> in GNU Health I am presented with tick 
boxes - Person, Institution, Insurance
>> Company, Pharmacy.
>>
>> Should GNU 
Health have 2 new tick box options to facilitate
>> the ordering and issuing of 
medicament and medical supplies - "Supplier" and
>> "Customer" (which may be a 
customer or a patient or a ward or a clinic)?
>I think for consistency reasons 
Andrew's suggestion makes sense.
>It is certainly a help for purchase clerks if 
the domain of party on 
>purchase order is restricted to party = supplier*.

>Further, some clinics have a shop where non-medical but health related 

>products are sold (fitness stuff, consumer orthopaedics, subsidized 
>food, 
books about health ect.). Those could profit from a tickmark 
>"Customer" in 
the context of tryton sale module (or any future POS).
>
>best regards,
>Carl-
Johan
>
>* P.S.: A supplier might not be a company but a person (think 
craftsmen 
>for example) and might be a patient at the same time. 
Person/Patient and 
>Supplier are not mutually exclusive.
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]