|
From: | Chet Ramey |
Subject: | Re: Valid characters for function names |
Date: | Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:27:43 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 11/25/19 12:02 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 11/25/19 9:41 AM, Reuti wrote:Hi, I got a script using foo++() as function name, and at first I was confused of a different behavior between bash 4.2, 4.4 and 5.0. After crawling some mailing lists whether this is allowed at all [...]You can do some fun stuff with function names, which seems fair since you can also do fun stuff with disk filenames in /usr/bin
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2019-01/msg00171.html -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU address@hidden http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |