[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I would like to see "cmd" alias for "bash" binary in every distribut
From: |
Eli Schwartz |
Subject: |
Re: I would like to see "cmd" alias for "bash" binary in every distribution |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:24:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 4/24/20 9:17 AM, Vaidas BoQsc wrote:
> Why the zero possibility.
Why should bash.git force this on people? I strongly object to this
proposed force-takeover of a global name in the $PATH for insufficient
rationale, and furthermore I'm personally bothered by the idea of
invoking bash as 'cmd', refuse to do so myself, and strongly recommend
that others do NOT use such an alias.
There now. Tell me why this opinion, which I'm confident is shared by
many people, should be overruled. What's the incentive for Chet to do so?
How would its implementation help the general public more than people
who want it, adding an alias for it?
--
Eli Schwartz
Arch Linux Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: I would like to see "cmd" alias for "bash" binary in every distribution, Emil Natan, 2020/04/24