[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose
|
From: |
Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev |
|
Subject: |
Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose |
|
Date: |
Sun, 7 Nov 2021 13:26:47 +0100 |
oh, i know about this one, .. guess no since-startup accurate value..
On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, 13:25 Dennis Williamson <dennistwilliamson@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, 2:47 AM Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> like 0.4s or so
>>
>
> Bash 5.0 alpha introduced the EPOCHREALTIME variable which includes
> Microseconds.
>
> echo "$EPOCHREALTIME"
> 1636287738.202356
>
>
>
- was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/11/07
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Dennis Williamson, 2021/11/07
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose,
Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <=
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Greg Wooledge, 2021/11/07
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Tapani Tarvainen, 2021/11/07
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Tapani Tarvainen, 2021/11/07
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/11/07
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Tapani Tarvainen, 2021/11/07
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/11/07
- Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/11/07
Re: was there a more fine number than $SECONDS for the same purpose, Tapani Tarvainen, 2021/11/07