[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: >= and <= for string comparison
From: |
Koichi Murase |
Subject: |
Re: >= and <= for string comparison |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:22:10 +0900 |
2023年1月18日(水) 17:14 alex xmb ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>:
> in (( and in [[
We are not talking about how to do each of the lexicographical and
numeric comparisons. We are talking about the lexicographical
``<=/-le'' and ``>=/-ge'' in [[. The point is that `<=' and `>=' are
not consistent with the current syntax of [[, and `-le' and `-ge' are
already used for the arithmetic comparisons.
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, (continued)
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Ruiyang Peng, 2023/01/16
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Ruiyang Peng, 2023/01/16
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Peng Yu, 2023/01/16
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Ruiyang Peng, 2023/01/17
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Koichi Murase, 2023/01/17
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Ruiyang Peng, 2023/01/17
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Lawrence Velázquez, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, alex xmb ratchev, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Lawrence Velázquez, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, alex xmb ratchev, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison,
Koichi Murase <=
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, alex xmb ratchev, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Ruiyang Peng, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Koichi Murase, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Ruiyang Peng, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Ruiyang Peng, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Tapani Tarvainen, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Ruiyang Peng, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Lawrence Velázquez, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Peng Yu, 2023/01/18
- Re: >= and <= for string comparison, Emanuele Torre, 2023/01/18