[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2024 09:36:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 5/19/24 4:29 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
The incorrect use of “pipeline” leads to the alteration of PIPESTATUS when
there is no real pipeline.
Stop digging. You're calling this use of the term `incorrect' because you
don't want to have to save the value. Decades of common usage trumps your
opinion.
PIPESTATUS should only be reset when there is a real
pipeline of two or more commands.
I already told you this wasn't going to change.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, (continued)
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Koichi Murase, 2024/05/18
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Peng Yu, 2024/05/18
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Koichi Murase, 2024/05/18
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Greg Wooledge, 2024/05/18
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/05/19
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Peng Yu, 2024/05/19
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Koichi Murase, 2024/05/20
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/05/19
- Message not available
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, 63l618u2, 2024/05/19
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Kerin Millar, 2024/05/19
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Chet Ramey, 2024/05/20
- Re: Not to set PIPESTATUS unless necessary, Chet Ramey, 2024/05/20