[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sed with Variable Substitution in the command
From: |
Wiley Young |
Subject: |
Re: sed with Variable Substitution in the command |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 2024 22:12:24 -0700 |
From: Steve Matzura
"... Variable substitution has always been a problem for me because there
doesn't seem to be a single hard-and-fast rule--sometimes the variable is
quoted, sometimes it's wrapped in braces...."
Regarding braces, it's always permissible to surround a parameter name in
braces, meaning that adding braces won't cause an error. On the other hand,
there are numerous situations where omitting braces would cause an error.
Okay ??
==== ====
"${foo}"
"$foo" is okay
"${bar##_*}"
"$bar##_*" is an error
"${1}"
"$1" is okay
"${11}"
"$11" is an error
"${array[1]}"
"$array[1]" is an error
I use the term "error" loosely to mean, unintended effects will occur.
Braces are also used for other things as well: compound commands, function
definitions, and brace expansion among others. Each of these are something
else, though.
Just always using braces _is_ extra typing. Some might say that it's less
_readable._ Still, doing so lets users more errors while remembering fewer
rules.
Wiley
Re: sed with Variable Substitution in the command,
Wiley Young <=
Re: sed with Variable Substitution in the command, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/09/27
Re: sed with Variable Substitution in the command, Andreas Kähäri, 2024/09/27
Re: sed with Variable Substitution in the command, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/09/27
Re: sed with Variable Substitution in the command, Andreas Kähäri, 2024/09/27
Re: sed with Variable Substitution in the command, Greg Wooledge, 2024/09/27