[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which lexer do people use?
|
From: |
Maury Markowitz |
|
Subject: |
Re: Which lexer do people use? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:00:17 -0400 |
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 6:46 AM, Christian Schoenebeck <schoenebeck@crudebyte.com>
> wrote:
> The only thing that people are missing once in a while on scanner side is
> unicode support
I am missing the capability to support grammars with optional spaces between
elements. In BASIC:
FORI=1TO5
is equivalent to:
FOR I=1 TO 5
I have yet to see an elegant way to model this in Flex. This topic comes up
time to time here, so I don't think Unicode is the "only" thing.
- Which lexer do people use?, Daniele Nicolodi, 2020/07/03
- Re: Which lexer do people use?, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/04
- Re: Which lexer do people use?, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/04
- Re: Which lexer do people use?, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/06
- Re: Which lexer do people use?,
Maury Markowitz <=
- Re: Which lexer do people use?, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/06
- Parsing a language with optional spaces, Maury Markowitz, 2020/07/06
- Re: Parsing a language with optional spaces, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/06
- Re: Parsing a language with optional spaces, Maury Markowitz, 2020/07/06
- Re: Parsing a language with optional spaces, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/06
- Re: Parsing a language with optional spaces, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/08
- Re: Parsing a language with optional spaces, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/06
- Re: Parsing a language with optional spaces, Maury Markowitz, 2020/07/06
- Re: Parsing a language with optional spaces, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/06
- Re: Parsing a language with optional spaces, John P. Hartmann, 2020/07/07