help-cfengine
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail


From: Mark . Burgess
Subject: Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:40:56 +0200 (MEST)

Only thing: please do diffs against the latest version, not 2.0.7.
Latest sources are on the website, also as 2.1.0 alpha

M

On 30 Jul, Bas van der Vlies wrote:
> address@hidden wrote:
> 
>> 
>> As long as it's rational and nothing breaks, by all means.
>> 
>> M
>> 
>> 
>> On 30 Jul, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
>> 
>>>Quoting Bas van der Vlies <address@hidden> (2003-07-30 11:06:05 BST):
>>>
>>>>Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Quoting Bas van der Vlies <address@hidden> (2003-07-30 10:34:53 BST):
>>>>>
>>>>>>Should we not use the same syntax for turning on/off actions
>>>>>>cfagent -z sysadm, smptfrom, ....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It is easier to understand which variables we ask and we get back.
>>>>>>For me it make sense and there is a mechanism to query the cfagent
>>>>>>variables.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, that's nicer, I agree. Currently we use ':' as the standard
>>>>>separator don't we? So would 'cfagent -z foo:bar:baz -z quux -zbongo'
>>>>>be okay (as a bizarre way) to ask for foo, bar, baz, quux and bongo?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No the separator is ','. From the docs cfagent -j copy,tidy ;-)
>>>>cfagent -x boo,bar,baz -z quux -zbongo is one bizarre way to ask
>>>>for some variables.
>>>
>>>Yes, you're right. Even the code agrees with you ;) So Mark, want me
>>>to code this?
>>>
> 
> It is fine for me and the syntax is also clear. In the meanwhile i
> use my patch that fixes the smtpfrom line and wait for the new
> cfagent -z. Andrew if you need help with programming or testing.
> Do not hesitate to ask!
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272            Email:  address@hidden
Fax : +47 22453205            WWW  :  http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]