[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Radmind vs CFengine
From: |
Holger Schurig |
Subject: |
Re: Radmind vs CFengine |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:18:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.7.2 |
> As an example: If I was writing a perl utility to edit a config file, I
> would expend a lot of work seperating my data from the machinery. In
> cfengine, the cfagent *is* the machinery, and in a very real sense the
> cfagent.conf *is* the data. So you end up with actual lines and words
> mixed in with your procedure, so that your script becomes very localized.
Are you sure? I split my setup in little independent files:
aliases.conf groups.conf services.conf
apt.conf inputrc.conf site.conf
bashrc.conf issue.conf stopdaemons.conf
bootmsgs.conf less.conf strategies.conf
cd.conf mc.conf syslog.conf
cfagent.conf motd.conf sysrq.conf
cfservd.conf mountpoints.conf tcptimestamps.conf
control.conf movehome.conf tcpwrapper.conf
ctrlaltdel.conf moveopt.conf tidy.conf
CVS/ network.conf timezone.conf
.cvsignore nfs.conf update.conf
devpts.conf path.conf xterm.conf
dircolors.conf prompt.conf
disable.conf rclocal.conf
I could easily share some of them.
--
Try Linux 2.6 from BitKeeper for PXA2x0 CPUs at
http://www.mn-logistik.de/unsupported/linux-2.6/
- Re: Radmind vs CFengine, (continued)
Re: Radmind vs CFengine, Kurt Lieber, 2004/01/07
RE: Radmind vs CFengine, Wheeler, John, 2004/01/09