[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cfengine sources
From: |
Nate Campi |
Subject: |
Re: Cfengine sources |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:47:43 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:56:11AM +0200, Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no wrote:
>
> Why do you say that? I think there are several using cfengine on windows.
Nobody on the list seems to say anything when I post about issues on
windows:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/help-cfengine/2004-03/msg00101.html
I've hit up some windows coders I know but they didn't give very useful
help either.
No big deal, it's just that I can get better support for my windows
systems by paying for a commercial package. It's kinda what you expect
on windows anyways. It will really suck having two disconnected
management systems, though.
--
Nate
"UNIX is an operating system, OS/2 is half an operating system, Windows
is a shell, and DOS is a boot partition virus." - Peter H. Coffin .
- Re: Cfengine sources, (continued)
- Re: Cfengine sources, John Sechrest, 2004/04/14
- Re: Cfengine sources, John Sechrest, 2004/04/14
- Re: Cfengine sources, John Sechrest, 2004/04/14
- Re: Cfengine sources, Chip Seraphine, 2004/04/14
- Re: Cfengine sources, John Sechrest, 2004/04/14
- Re: Cfengine sources, Mark . Burgess, 2004/04/14
Re: Cfengine sources, Christian Pearce, 2004/04/14
Re: Cfengine sources, Christian Pearce, 2004/04/15
Re: Cfengine sources, Christian Pearce, 2004/04/15