[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
shellcommands returns 256, not 0
From: |
David Kewley |
Subject: |
shellcommands returns 256, not 0 |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:07:53 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
I can probably find a hack to work around this, but I wonder if anyone else
has seen this and can suggest a clean solution?
I'm running cfengine on RHL 9. I am running a pair of shellcommands like
this:
shellcommands:
work::
"/usr/bin/test -d $(host_keys_master_dir)"
owner=$(private_owner)
group=$(private_group)
inform=false
useshell=true
define=have_host_keys_master
work.have_host_keys_master::
"/usr/bin/diff -qr $(host_keys_master_dir) $(host_keys_workdir)
&& /bin/cp
-a $(host_keys_master_dir)/* $(host_keys_workdir)"
owner=$(private_owner)
group=$(private_group)
useshell=true
The reason I'm doing a shellcommands 'cp' instead of a copy: is that I need
the copy to be done as a non-root user, but cfengine is run as root.
Anyway, the problem I'm now seeing is that although the first shellcommand
(/usr/bin/test) gives a return value of 0 when run in bash, it returns 256
when run by cfengine. cfengine interprets this as a failure (non-zero), so
does not do the 'define', and the second shellcommand is not executed.
I've seen this before and found a way to work around it, but it was a hack.
Does anyone know how to deal with this cleanly? Is this a bug somewhere, or
expected behavior? What does return code 256 indicate?
Thanks,
David
- shellcommands returns 256, not 0,
David Kewley <=
- Re: shellcommands returns 256, not 0, Christian Pearce, 2004/04/19
- Re: shellcommands returns 256, not 0, David Kewley, 2004/04/19
- Re: shellcommands returns 256, not 0, David Kewley, 2004/04/19
- Re: shellcommands returns 256, not 0, Marion Hakanson, 2004/04/19
- Re: shellcommands returns 256, not 0, Brendan Strejcek, 2004/04/19
- Re: shellcommands returns 256, not 0, Chris Edillon, 2004/04/19
- Re: shellcommands returns 256, not 0, Mark . Burgess, 2004/04/20