[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linux ACLs
From: |
Wil Cooley |
Subject: |
Re: Linux ACLs |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:21:40 -0700 |
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 12:47 +0200, Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no wrote:
> I have now looked more closely at the Linux ACLs and have decided
> that this cannot be supported in the next release of cfengine.
>
> The API is far more complicated than in Solaris and clear information
> about it is not easy to find right now. It is not clear whether the
> details might change. I don't know why the Linux kernel writers have
> created such a difficult API instead of using something compatible
> with Solaris, but this is not as simple as I thought it ought to be.
>
> Regardless, I do not want to introduce any instability into 2.1.11
> by adding this now.
Are you looking at the POSIX 1003.1e ACLs in the ext2/3 filesystem or SE
Linux stuff?
Wil
--
Wil Cooley wcooley@nakedape.cc
Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs,
Wil Cooley <=
- Message not available
- Re: Linux ACLs, Philippe, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Sven Mueller, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Sven Mueller, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: Linux ACLs, Philippe, 2004/10/27