[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: editfiles missing the profound function?

From: Yaroslav Halchenko
Subject: Re: editfiles missing the profound function?
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:41:25 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

damn me - I should probably RTFM once again.
I've checked and indeed DefineClass is caused on per file basis not on
per-rule basis. What I mean is that if for the same file I have two
rules setup because there are different classes

  DefineClass c1

  DefineClass c2

then even if modifications1 are not done, it defines c1 if
modifications2 were done... aaaa - that sounds "not good". It seems to
be not that crucial but can have sideeffects I would say.

Indeed your double-command should be fine under current cfengine :-)

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:28:58AM -0600, Brendan Strejcek wrote:
> address@hidden wrote:
> I don't understand. What do you mean by "action associated with" ? If
> you are using DefineClasses to trigger another action, it will work just
> fine. The class will be defined if the file is changed. Or are you using
> RunScript?

Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT, Master @ CS Dept. UNM

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]