[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: editfiles missing the profound function?
From: |
Brendan Strejcek |
Subject: |
Re: editfiles missing the profound function? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:28:58 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
lists@onerussian.com wrote:
> > > but this kicks in on every run, doesn't it?
>
> > cfagent edits a buffer-copy of the file. When done editing, it only
> > replaces the file on disk if the two differ. Thus, if your edit
> > results in the same file, nothing is actually changed, including
> > file metadata such as timestamps.
>
> it doesn't work if there is an action associated with the editing
> being performed
I don't understand. What do you mean by "action associated with" ? If
you are using DefineClasses to trigger another action, it will work just
fine. The class will be defined if the file is changed. Or are you using
RunScript?
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, (continued)
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, Jamie Wilkinson, 2005/02/23
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, Mark Burgess, 2005/02/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2005/02/23
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/02/23
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, lists, 2005/02/23
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, Adams, Russell L., 2005/02/23
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/02/23
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, lists, 2005/02/23
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?,
Brendan Strejcek <=
- Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2005/02/23
Re: editfiles missing the profound function?, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2005/02/23