[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch to add install action to packages:
From: |
Mark Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: Patch to add install action to packages: |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:16:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 |
I was trying to use this on SuSE recently, whihc also uses RPM but it does not
work because the package naming convention is different, There is clearly
a lot to be done on the matter of package management,
M
> Phil D'Amore wrote:
> > I used RPM as an example here, but all three supported package managers
> > *should* work. You can actually use more than one package manager at
> > once, since each keeps its own to-be-installed list. If folks could
> > test the Debian and Sun parts of this, it'd be greatly appreciated, as I
> > don't really have the facilities to do so ;). Most of the code for this
> > is package manager agnostic, except for the part that decides which
> > variable to read for the install command (RPMInstallCommand,
> > DPKGInstallCommand, SUNInstallCommand), so I'm expecting it will Just
> > Work (tm).
>
> I realize that I'm not up to speed on the packages section and its
> support - but there are more than three package formats.
>
> Beyond the three listed above, I can think of several:
>
> * HP-UX software depots
> * FreeBSD packages
> * Slackware packages
>
> And this doesn't account for alternative installation programs, although
> that may not be relevant - RPMInstall command could be set to "apt-get
> install" for instance.
>
> However, I find the names "RPMInstallCommand" et al to be just ghastly.
> What if RPM is phased out and replaced with the new name
> FooBarPackageMgr? What if someone installs RPM on a SUN machine? What
> if someone installs RPM onto Debian and uses it? More importantly, how
> are you EVER going to be able to get ALL package managers represented?
>
> The commands ought to be package manager neutral, should they not?
>
> --
> David Douthitt
> UNIX System Administrator
> Linux+, LPIC-1, RHCE
> HP-UX, Unixware, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD
> Member: ACM, USENIX/SAGE
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-cfengine mailing list
> Help-cfengine@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: Patch to add install action to packages:,
Mark Burgess <=
- Re: Patch to add install action to packages:, Phil D'Amore, 2005/02/25
- Re: Patch to add install action to packages:, Mark Burgess, 2005/02/26
- Re: Patch to add install action to packages:, Phil D'Amore, 2005/02/26
- Re: Patch to add install action to packages:, Mark Burgess, 2005/02/28
- Re: Patch to add install action to packages:, Phil D'Amore, 2005/02/28