Re: Defining classes in update.conf that are seen by cfagent.conf?

[Tim Nelson]

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:

> Is it possible to define a class in the update.conf that will be carried
> over to cfagent.conf? This doesn't seem to be the case right now.
> Specifically a define= on a copy command? Would autodefine work in this
> case, eg would an autodefine in cfagent.conf pick up on a copy that
> happened in the update phase?

	I can't think of anything non-klugy (ie. make a file in 
update.conf, and check it in cfagent.conf), but have you considered 
moving that particular copy to your cfagent.conf (and use actionsequence 
to put it at the very start)?

        :)

--
Tim Nelson
Server Administrator
WebAlive Technologies Global
Level 1 Innovation Building, Digital Harbour
1010 LaTrobe Street
Docklands, Melbourne, 
Vic, 3008
Phone: +61 3 9934 0812
Fax: +61 3 9934 0899
E-mail: tim.nelson@webalive.biz
http://www.webalive.biz/

"Your Business, Your Web, Your Control"