[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: cfengine failover on copy does not seem to work as documented
From: |
Nielsen, Steve |
Subject: |
RE: cfengine failover on copy does not seem to work as documented |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:56:22 -0500 |
I agree that failover should only trigger on error conditions. Is that
what you mean (how I am interpreting what you say below)?
I was hoping to find out from Mark if this is how its intended to work
(only failover on network reachability) or if this is a bug or
oversight ?
Mark any comments ?
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Chip Seraphine [mailto:chip@trdlnk.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:20 AM
To: Nielsen, Steve; Cfengine Mailing List Help
Subject: Re: cfengine failover on copy does not seem to work as
documented
Nielsen, Steve wrote:
>I would think any of these errors should also trigger the failover
>class:
>
>* server is up but file not found
>* copy is local but file not found
>
>Comments ?
>
>
I'd rather have it simply triggered when we have any result other than
either a sucessful copy *or* the copy is not attempted. That would
also catch things like "server up, file found but unreadable" (happens
when you are reading from an NFS server with root squashed).