[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defaultroute problem with multiple network interfaces
From: |
Steve Sizemore |
Subject: |
Re: defaultroute problem with multiple network interfaces |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:59:23 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Thanks for the response.
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:44:35PM -0800, Atom Powers wrote:
> Maybe:
> ----
> defaultroute:
> 128_32_183.!169_229_58::
> 128.32.183.254
>
> 169_229_58.!128_32_183.::
> 169.229.58.1
I don't understand what the extra "." is supposed to be doing, but
it does seem to make a difference. This stops the error messages,
because the host with dual NICs is now not in either of those
classes. However, if I add it back explicitly, the errors come
back, so the problem isn't solved.
What does the trailing . on the class mean?
> use cfagent -qv to see which classes are getting defined.
Yes, I always do that in testing mode, and I can see that both 128_32_183
and 169_229_58 are defined for that host.
Thanks.
Steve
--
Steve Sizemore <steve (at) ls.berkeley.edu>, (510) 642-8570
Unix System Manager
Dept. of Mathematics and College of Letters and Science
University of California, Berkeley
- defaultroute problem with multiple network interfaces, Steve Sizemore, 2006/01/06
- Re: defaultroute problem with multiple network interfaces, Atom Powers, 2006/01/06
- Re: defaultroute problem with multiple network interfaces,
Steve Sizemore <=
- Cfengine for Monitoring ????, Friendly Tourney, 2006/01/06
- Re: Cfengine for Monitoring ????, Atom Powers, 2006/01/06
- Re: Cfengine for Monitoring ????, Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/06
- Re: Cfengine for Monitoring ????, Mark Burgess, 2006/01/07
- Re: Cfengine for Monitoring ????, Jason Edgecombe, 2006/01/07
- Re: Cfengine for Monitoring ????, Mark Burgess, 2006/01/07
- Re: Cfengine for Monitoring ????, rader, 2006/01/07
- Re: Cfengine for Monitoring ????, Mark Burgess, 2006/01/07
- Re: Cfengine for Monitoring ????, rader, 2006/01/08