[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merge goes the wrong way
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: Merge goes the wrong way |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:39:48 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hello Phillip,
Phillip Susi wrote:
> No matter which order I specify the arguments to the merge command in,
> it always dups the bug with the higher number against the lower
> number, causing the lower numbered bug to be the one shown in the bug
> list. I want it the other way around since the higher numbered bug is
> the one with the good information and title.
As far as I know that is just the way merge works in the BTS. AFAIK
it always orders them based upon the bug number.
I suggest unmerging the low numbered bug you don't want. Then add a
note referencing the better bug. Then closing the lowered number bug.
That way anyone finding and reading the lower numbered bug will have a
reference over to the "better" bug. And then all of the tracking and
information can continue in the later better bug. The BTS is a useful
tool but we shouldn't be a slave to it.
Note that although I have used the BTS quite a while I don't consider
myself an expert on the internals. I am just a user. There very well
may be another way. Glenn would certainly know for sure.
Bob