[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h-e-w] term (ansi-term) and cygwin
From: |
Benoit ROUSSELLE |
Subject: |
Re: [h-e-w] term (ansi-term) and cygwin |
Date: |
12 Jun 2002 13:55:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
"Sprenger, Karel" <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Benoit,
Hi Karel,
>
> For me M-x term fails as it does for you, that is: I get a buffer in
ok so i am not alone ;)
> which nothing happens. But why would you want to run man in a
> terminal buffer? In a shell buffer it works just fine, although you
same for me. I need a good terminal emulation because at my work we
use application that are interactive with your terminal, in the same
way "top" is working or man ...
> get the complete manual in your the buffer. If you don't want that,
> use woman or the regular man (although in that case you would have
> to make sure the man program gets the proper MANPATH). Less doesn't
> seem to work in a shell buffer, but then again, isn't emacs great
> for browsing in a buffer?
your are right, i don't use a terminal for using man or less i prefer
the emacs way: that was just for example.
--
-------------------
Benoit ROUSSELLE