[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c
From: |
John Millaway |
Subject: |
Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:33:59 -0700 (PDT) |
> So how did they fail, to make you say you "don't have a suitable method"
> for doing this (or whatever --- forgot the exact wording).
Because many of the flex variables are generated from outside the skeleton,
and do not exist across all scanners. The only 100% method would be to build
scanners using all possible combinations of %options, and all possible
"features", e.g., using REJECT in actions -- then run the resulting code
through tools like `cscope' or `nm'.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
- bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/14
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c,
John Millaway <=
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17