Re: [help-GIFT] Re: Patches AMD 64 next try...

[risc]

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:15:06PM +0100, Wolfgang Mueller wrote:
> Julia,
> 
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> > OK, i'm dumb. ;)
> No, most definitely not :).
> 
> BTW if you want to do something scary, try to use VI with a 3-year old
> who loves keyboards on your lap :-) .
> > 
> > its worth mentioning, the fix for this should likely be the same as the 
> > "hack" in my patch.
> > 
> > uint_fast32_t is 32bit on ia32, and 64bit on AMD64.
> Great. Next thing I will add the check that all indexes stay in the
> square. Of course with #ifdefs around.
> > 
> > i'll try to compile gift on my PPC sometime soon (playstation 3 
> > power/cell), and make sure everything compiles right.
> Great. I will be on conferences most of next two weeks, so I will be
> pretty non-responsive.
> 
> Cheers,
> Wolfgang
> --
> Dr. Wolfgang Mueller
> LS Medieninformatik
> Universitaet Bamberg
> 


according to my calculations, this should not be necissary.. that said, do what 
you will. ;)

as you can likely tell from my recent code, i have a bit of a tendancy to use 
funny pointer math. i've made errors before.

Julia Longtin <address@hidden>