|
From: | Nigel Galloway |
Subject: | Re: [Help-glpk] Using lpx_integer for more than 200 variables |
Date: | Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:05:50 +0100 |
You may find the following examples interesting.
A 'small' problem with two variables:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-glpk/2008-02/msg00052.html
A large problem:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-glpk/2008-03/msg00056.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "RC Loh"
To: "Ali Baharev"
Subject: Re: [Help-glpk] Using lpx_integer for more than 200 variables
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:19:26 +0800 (SGT)
Hi Ali,
Thank you very much for your reply.. Just a clarification, what do you mean that glpsol would not solve MIP problem with less than 20 integer variables? Do you mean that it takes a very, very long time? In term of hours or in term of days to solve 20 integer variables?
Thank you.
Rdgs,
Paul
----- Original Message ----
From: Ali Baharev <address@hidden>
To: RC Loh <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2008 6:29:53
Subject: Re: [Help-glpk] Using lpx_integer for more than 200 variables
Dear Paul,
The number of integer variables is just one thing. I think i have a
MIP problem with less than 20 integer variables and glpsol would not
be able to solve it.
You should first improve and / or simplify your model rather than
change the code of the GLPK.
Or try a commercial solver such as ILOG CPLEX 10 and see what that can
do, it is not likely you could write a better (general purpose) solver
than that.
You should also try a higher version of GLPK because as far as i know
the MIP part was improved since 4.19.
Good luck,
Ali
Get your preferred Email name!
Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com.
_______________________________________________
Help-glpk mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
_______________________________________________
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |