[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Help-glpk] Why would fixed constraints lead to infeasibility?
From: |
Sam Seaver |
Subject: |
[Help-glpk] Why would fixed constraints lead to infeasibility? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:51:28 +0400 |
Dear all,
I'm getting an "Problem has no feasible solution" error from my use of
GLPK. I have found I can solve this by relaxing the upper and lower
constraints I have on one column in my constraint matrix.
The constraints are fixed and equal:
Col Lower Upper
ATPM 8.39 8.39
and if I relax the constrains arbitrarily, and in a small manner so
that they are no longer equal, for example:
Col Lower Upper
ATPM 8.389 8.39
Then glpk will return an optimal solution.
What I don't understand is why I should have to do this? Is it
related to the tolerance of glpk, in that the difference between the
upper and lower constraints must be more than 1e-6 or something like
that?
Thanks
Sam
--
Graduate student
Northwestern University
Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences (IBiS) Program
2205 Tech Drive (Room 2-108 )
Evanston, IL 60208, US
http://amaral.northwestern.edu/people/seaver/
address@hidden
- [Help-glpk] Why would fixed constraints lead to infeasibility?,
Sam Seaver <=
- Re: [Help-glpk] Why would fixed constraints lead to infeasibility?, Michael Hennebry, 2009/09/18
- Re: [Help-glpk] Why would fixed constraints lead to infeasibility?, Sam Seaver, 2009/09/21
- Re: [Help-glpk] Why would fixed constraints lead to infeasibility?, Michael Hennebry, 2009/09/21
- Re: [Help-glpk] Why would fixed constraints lead to infeasibility?, Sam Seaver, 2009/09/22
- Re: [Help-glpk] Why would fixed constraints lead to infeasibility?, Michael Hennebry, 2009/09/22