[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bpp plus type constrain
From: |
Michael Hennebry |
Subject: |
Re: bpp plus type constrain |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Oct 2023 11:26:41 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) |
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, Michael Hennebry wrote:
YY{y in mouldTypes, b in 1..n, i in I: mo[i]==t} y[t, b] >= x[i, b] ;
Oops. A y where a t was needed. The corrected version:
YY{t in mouldTypes, b in 1..n, i in I: mo[i]==t} y[t, b] >= x[i, b] ;
--
Michael hennebry@mail.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu
"Occasionally irrational explanations are required" -- Luke Roman
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/05
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Leonardo Corato, 2023/10/06
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Graciela Coitinho, 2023/10/06
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/06
- Re: bpp plus type constrain,
Michael Hennebry <=
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Leonardo Corato, 2023/10/11
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/11
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/06
- Re: bpp plus type constrain, Michael Hennebry, 2023/10/06