[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
mac-emacs, was: Tramp in Emacs 21?
From: |
Tom Roche |
Subject: |
mac-emacs, was: Tramp in Emacs 21? |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:47:29 -0500 (EST) |
Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@ncsu.edu> Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:39:23 -0500
>> I would like to see emacs become "the multiplatform editor" not
>> only because it runs on so many platforms (which it does now--FWIW
>> IIRC the mac-emacs folks had 21 binaries up before the win32
>> folks),
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:58:22 +0200
> as for the fact that the Mac port was available before the Windows
> one: it's simply because of administrative problems that prevented
> the person who compiled the Windows binaries from having write
> access to the appropriate directory. There's no real problem here,
> and nothing to talk about.
I didn't mean to imply that there was a problem; I meant merely to
"give props" to Andrew Choi and whoever else works on mac-emacs.
Unfortunately IMHO emacs folks tend not to think of the mac as an
"emacs-capable" platform, and mac folks (at least the ones I know)
tend not to be aware of emacs, or gnu tools generally. (or cmdline
anything :-)
broadening horizons? or failing ?-) Tom_Roche@ncsu.edu
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- mac-emacs, was: Tramp in Emacs 21?,
Tom Roche <=