[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?
From: |
Ilya Zakharevich |
Subject: |
Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what? |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 01:30:54 +0000 (UTC) |
[A complimentary Cc of this posting was sent to
Jason Rumney
<jasonr@btinternet.co>], who wrote in article
<m2smzrf9op.fsf@nyaumo.btinternet.com>:
> > I made tables for 1 jis and 1 ksc so that xterm can use such fonts for
> > utf stuff (not in the released versions of xterm yet :-[). However, I
> > do not see a point in supporting Emacs: even if I contribute these,
> > they would not be used for display purposes - Emacs does not do
> > remapping for display purposes...
>
> It does, but nonetheless, I am not surprised at your response, given
> your tone in the rest of the thread and in previous threads to which
> you have contributed.
The other posters to this thread say that it does not, but I'm not
surprised at etc...
Ilya
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Peter J. Acklam, 2002/10/01
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Jason Rumney, 2002/10/01
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?,
Ilya Zakharevich <=
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Ilya Zakharevich, 2002/10/02
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/10/03
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Ilya Zakharevich, 2002/10/05
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/10/05
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Ilya Zakharevich, 2002/10/05
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/10/07
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Ilya Zakharevich, 2002/10/07
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/10/08